Japan preparing amphibious force: it looks a lot like a Marine brigade

News
The Japan Maritime Self-Defense Force and U.S. Navy simulate a beach-front assault during a past Dawn Blitz exercise at Camp Pendleton, Calif. Japan plans to activate its 2,100-member Amphibious Rapid Deployment Brigade by March 2018. (Kenan O'Connor/U.S. Navy)
From Stripes.com
The Japan Maritime Self-Defense Force and U.S. Navy simulate a beach-front assault during a past Dawn Blitz exercise at Camp Pendleton, Calif. Japan plans to activate its 2,100-member Amphibious Rapid Deployment Brigade by March 2018. (Kenan O'Connor/U.S. Navy)

Japan preparing amphibious force: it looks a lot like a Marine brigade

by: Erik Slavin | .
Stars and Stripes | .
published: November 05, 2016

TOKYO — Japan is taking another step closer to fielding a Marine Corps-like brigade that would defend its southwestern territory, amid increasing tensions with China over who rightfully owns islands in the East China Sea.

A combined U.S.-Japan scenario in the Northern Marianas to retake an island during the Keen Sword exercise this week represents a major philosophical shift — one that some military analysts say is overdue — from the land-focused strategy long employed by Japan’s Self-Defense Forces.

The 2,100-member Amphibious Rapid Deployment Brigade, planned for activation by March 2018, could be used for various missions, including quicker humanitarian relief after a natural disaster.

But analysts say its deterrent effect against Chinese claims on Japan-controlled territory will be the brigade’s greatest contribution.

Beijing has deemed the Japan-administered Senkaku Islands an “indisputable” part of China and declared an air defense identification zone over them in 2013.

The U.S. is obligated to defend the Senkakus and any other Japanese territory under the terms of a security treaty with Japan.

Navy officials say privately they wouldn’t be surprised if Chinese intelligence ships monitored Keen Sword from international waters, which they’re entitled to do under the U.S. view of international law.

Read more at: http://www.stripes.com/1.437440

Tags: News
Related Content: No related content is available